Mike Johnson and Nikki Haley’s Parallel Paths of Humiliation
Nikki Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who campaigned for office without any of her resources, participated in the Republican primary election in Nevada on Tuesday and was defeated by no one.
It is estimated that approximately 47,000 Republican voters in Nevada opted to vote for “none of these candidates” rather than her. This is a large amount of supporters of the Republican Party. Even though Haley is embarrassed, the outcome is an excellent representation of the current position inside the Republican Party.
There is no longer any interest in national leadership, an agenda, or programs on the part of the Republican Party, which has degenerated into a political vacuum. “No one” was the option that Republicans always chose when they were offered the choice between two persons.
Taking into consideration the events that took place on Capitol Hill that occurred this week, it may seem to be a serious charge. The Republicans were eventually able to get what they wanted, which was for the president and the Democrats in the Senate to implement more stringent border security measures in return for financial support for Ukraine; however, they ultimately declined the offer.
When Republicans and Democrats discuss immigration, the former often advocate for more stringent enforcement laws, while the latter advocates for Democrats to take a more lenient attitude on the legal status of illegal immigrants. In this round, Democrats would have gained nothing at all: there would have been no amnesty, no path to citizenship, and no support for Dreamers. As a means of paving the way for legislation on military assistance to Ukraine, they made concessions to the Republican Party that were both historic and unusual.
This bill was the eventual consequence, and it was one of the immigration laws that was approved lately that was the most restrictive. Within a few hours after the publishing of the document, Republican members in Congress made it quite clear that they wanted nothing more than that.
The problem at the border and the way that President Joe Biden has handled it has been a source of frustration for Republicans for many years. The Republican Party, on the other hand, decided to keep the complaint and delay taking any action on the possible remedy, which was a bill, when they were given the chance to do so.
James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma who was the negotiator of the accord, was very perplexed by the peculiar about-face that his party had made. The only thing that was startling about the outcome, however, was that Lankford had failed to predict it. Disagreements will inevitably remain at the centre of the Republican Party. It is more of a political reason to let problems fester so that the party may rally its followers than it is to find answers, which implies that finding solutions is less of a priority.
As an illustration of how difficult it is for the Republican Party to accomplish their objectives, the impeachment of Alejandro Mayorkas, the secretary of homeland security, is only one example available.
House Republicans have been waiting for this moment for a very long time, and on Tuesday, Speaker Mike Johnson (R–La.) finally brought the impeachment resolution against Mayorkas to the floor. Voting was little more than a symbolic act. In addition, the Republicans did not even bother to identify whether Mayorkas was accused of committing a severe criminal or a misdemeanour, and the Senate had no intention of condemning him.
The attempt would have been useless, much as the Republican Party’s doctrine on the government being implemented. Despite this, Mayorkas was able to escape being “defenestrated” in a symbolic sense since the House was in a stalemate with a vote of 215-215 when the roll call vote was finished.
It is quite unlikely that there was a more embarrassing outcome for Republicans than what transpired around twenty minutes later when the House of Representatives deliberated on legislation to assist Israel. Further evidence that Republicans are awful at counting votes is provided by the collapse of this measure. This is their worst performance, even worse than their record in government.
Regrettably, this Congress has not made much ground in terms of advancement. Twenty-seven pieces of legislation were adopted by the House of Representatives in 2023 for a total of 724 votes, making it the least productive Congress in the previous decade. On the other hand, the Democratic-controlled Congress in 2022 resulted in the passage of 248 legislation, while the total number of votes received was 549.
In November, the Republican Party will present to voters some legislation, including the Duck Stamp Modernization Act of 2023 and the United States Marine Corps Commemorative Coin Act, which will commemorate the 250th anniversary of the United States Marine Corps.
On the other hand, followers of the Republican Party are not very interested in “doing stuff.” Having “stuff to be angry about” is far more handy for them than anything else. To add insult to injury, Republican legislators are going to great lengths to fulfil their requests.
When Republicans controlled both the House of Representatives and the President in 2017, they had a significant amount of power to make decisions in the policy arena. Specifically, what topics were they talking about? The economy, the border, educational institutions, or medical care? Please come right away.
When it comes to health care, they placed the abolition and replacement of Obamacare as their main priority; nevertheless, they were not successful in accomplishing this goal. The creation of a replacement piece of law took an interminable amount of time, and we are still waiting for it.
The unsuccessful effort by Republicans to repeal a huge Democratic accomplishment and replace it with nothing is perhaps the quintessential example of Republican lobbying in the corridors of power in the history of the United States.
The majority of the Republicans were successful in achieving tax reform during their two years in government, even though the majority of Americans disapproved of it. However, the rich foundation of the party benefitted from the change. In 2018, Democrats were able to reclaim control of the House of Representatives, which was undoubtedly welcomed by Republicans since it allowed them to begin their favourite activity, which is whining about Democrats, rather than legislating anything.
The Republican National Committee just repurposed the previous platform for Donald Trump’s re-election campaign, however, they changed the word “2016” to “2020.” Now it is here! Although Trump is running for president for the third time this year, it does not seem that he is using any particular policy platform to further his campaign.
To be sincere, it is necessary to acknowledge that the fundamental principle of conservatism is, in essence, the rejection of government interference in favour of increasing the level of internal opposition. A person who is eager to see things done is someone who is considered progressive. Conservatives can sometimes be seen standing in front of the door and yelling “Stop.”
A very excessive level of ideological rigidity has been shown by members of this Republican Party. Even with a smaller government, you must comply with common sense and take actions such as developing a budget and addressing the obvious problems, especially those that you have been neglecting for a considerable amount of time. The Republican Party, in its current form, is incapable of even keeping the government operating, much alone avoiding an economic default, without driving the country to the verge of a disaster. Even this is too much for them to handle.
Even though the votes that took place in Congress this week give the appearance that they would want to do something, it is difficult to imagine that they could accomplish what they want to do. One further thing that is adding salt to injury is the fact that they do not know how to govern.
Rather than criticizing Republicans for their unwavering commitment to their role as representatives of the people, maybe we should instead thank them for their standing. To put it another way, they are providing their supporters with precisely what they want, and maybe what they deserve for constantly re-electing leaders who have little interest in really running the show.
You May Like these News articles Also 🙂
Pingback: The 2024 Elections: Character, Policy, and Strategic Choices - usavotey.com
Thank you for providing me with these article examples. May I ask you a question?